Taxes, exceptional trees, and government waste

April 15 is just around the corner — a mere 1 month away! — and that means it’s time to break out your abacus and legal dictionary, and start reading the fine print. I’m always amazed at how unnecessarily complicated the US’s income tax system is. One irate taxpayer compiled this funny list of all the various esoteric tax breaks in state tax codes across the country. My favorite is the Exceptional Trees Deduction in Hawaii, which applies to state tax form line 17:

Exceptional Trees Deduction: You may deduct up to $3,000 per exceptional tree for qualified expenditures you made during the taxable year to maintain the tree on your private property. The tree must be designated as an exceptional tree by the local county arborist advisory committee under chapter 58, HRS.

First, there’s the obvious question: what kind of tree is so exceptional it needs up to $3,000 in maintenance each year?

But more importantly, why on earth is this in the tax code in the first place? If the good people of the state of Hawaii decide that they want to incentivize private property owners to maintain and protect what must be some really awesome trees, cool. Apparently the state already has a system of local arborists, so why not have the arborist team up with the treasurer of the local government to cut people checks for taking care of their fabulous trees?

Because that would be evil, evil ‘government spending’, which is a big no-no in the modern political climate. So instead, we’ve turned to the tax code for a big chunk of our policy implementation. The end result is the same — more money in the hands of people who care for exceptional trees — but instead of directly spending the money by cutting a check, we use tax expenditures. We reduce the dendro-samaritan’s tax burden from what it normally would be and then necessarily keep everyone else’s taxes just slightly higher than they’d need to be, in order to pay for the original tax expenditure. And this is just one of a million other examples: mortgage write-offs, health care benefit write-offs, business investment write-offs, dependent write-offs, blind person write-offs, etc., etc., etc. .

I’m actually a fan of robust government, and I think it’s a net positive thing to incentivize people to do good things they wouldn’t otherwise do enough of, like investing and create new jobs, or providing health insurance to employees. But our myopic and infantile politics means that if we do this by cutting people checks, then we’re socialists. But if we do it through tax expenditures, we’re just good pragmatic capitalists.

When choosing between direct spending and tax expenditures, the net social effect is exactly the same. But which one we choose matters, because the result of our love of tax expenditures is a hodgepodge of refunds, exemptions, write-offs, exclusions, that even forces experts to use TurobTax when they file. Americans now spend a total of 6.6 billion hours and $194 billion every year just to file their taxes. Clearly it’s better for all those normal, non-exceptional-tree-owning, Hawaiian tax payers to not have to waste their time reading through the rules about Line 17 deductions, and to just have the local arborists cutting checks while everyone else gets on with their lives. But I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for that socialist utopia.

5 Responses to “Taxes, exceptional trees, and government waste”

  1. 1 Nathan March 17, 2010 at 9:39 am

    “Americans now spend a total of 6.6 billion hours and $194 billion every year just to file their taxes. Clearly it’s better for all those normal, non-exceptional-tree-owning, Hawaiian tax payers to not have to waste their time reading through the rules about Line 17 deductions, and to just have the local arborists cutting checks while everyone else gets on with their lives.”

    I think the lobbyists from H&R Block would disagree.

  2. 2 marie J Burns April 13, 2013 at 1:36 am

    My name is Marie J Burns. I am a tree climbing arborist and owner of my own tree trimming business here on the Big Island of Hawaii. I am very excited about this tax refund and can shed some light on this situation from a professional arborist perspective, professional tree hugger and tree cosmetologists. Here is how it goes, my own opinion from the Big Island of Hawaii. I live in the Ka’u district which is the largest districts and contains more land area of virgin untouched native forest in the whole state. This is the last piece of country and the poorest economic region but the wealthiest in resources. One of the resources is our forest. We have complete intact systems of untouched native forests meaning all plant life is pre-western contact. From the bottom of the forest including small shrubs and grasses to the tops of our trees a hundred feet or more above. Amongst these native forests come high concentrations of endemic living creatures found nowhere else in the world including birds, bugs and our happy face spider to name a few. The whole system goes together. I love my forest and am very excited about using this tax refund to help save our forest this is how we shall benefit. The forest is currently dying right before my very own eyes. As a child what used to be a lush green forest has become complete fire hazards and often whole sections are looking dead from top to bottom. The forests are drying up at an alarming rate. The solution is to water and to trim out dead sections of the large trees. When I have done this for my clients the trees have become very happy. However, I have many clientele that do not have the money to invest however if they can receive a tax refund I can gain work and the forest could be saved. One property owner with an acre of Ohia over six hundred to a thousand years old reaching from sixty to a hundred feet in the air with the top half being dead requires a crane. A crane job to clean up these trees could easily spend $3,000, save these ancient monsters and prevent the continued die back of ancient Hawaiian forests. Well, I am an opportunist and believe this is a great way to spend tax dollars. Through this tax refund, here in Ka’u, we are providing jobs in an economically depressed area, I am struggling to make a living, while also protecting a resource for us all, our ancient forest. Anyone who would like to take a tour is welcome to come see for themselves. Just come to Ka’u district and go around town asking for Marie the tree trimmer. WHO’Z NEXT?

  3. 3 their Kindle Paperwhite review says July 16, 2013 at 1:43 am

    Everyone loves what you guys
    tend to be up too. This sort
    of clever work and coverage!

    Keep up the awesome works guys I’ve you guys to my own blogroll.

  4. 4 elite eye serum Negative reviews August 15, 2014 at 10:23 pm

    My brother recommended I might like this blog.
    He was totally right. This post actually made my day.
    You cann’t imagine just how much time I had
    spent for this information! Thanks!

  1. 1 How to end tax expenditures the right way « Joint Stock Company Trackback on July 20, 2010 at 6:18 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Subscribe by email, feedburner

Subscribe by e-mail

or subscribe with feedburner

This is a group blog. JSC5 currently writes from the US. JSC7 writes from behind the Great Firewall of China.

wordpress statistics

Categories and tags


%d bloggers like this: